It is always just a little interesting the facts which Republican’s choose to highlight or remember. Looks like Obama is actually keeping people more safe by these counts. Facts suck! I guess that’s why so many are omitted from Fox News stories.
With the election over and a resounding “Nah, we don’t want to go backward” asserted in the voting, I look forward to the country to moving forward and supporting the intent of the electorate by getting some work done. While a nice thing to ponder – I’m not sure compromise and getting things done is what is going to happen based on the lack of a new narrative from the conservatives. It is interesting to see how the conversation is moving forward or not so much in the conservative political narrative with no real discussions beyond Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!
Perhaps the challenge for the Republican’s is the absolute lack of meaningful things to talk about which won’t get themselves into trouble. Core platform considerations and beliefs seem to bring ire for the party of late from one faction or another inside the party, the conservative media complex or the general population. That makes Benghazi relevant and safe.
So since Benghazi is safe, it continues to monopolize the right wing discussion and it’s not a bad idea. So here is a list which examines why it might be better to stretch out Benghazi as long as possible, even when key party members are confirming that nothing of note really happened.
Why Republican’s Should Keep Talking about Benghazi
Net-Net: It’s a whole lot safer to blame the President for some type of clerical error or purposeful edit in talking points around a terrorism event and creating potential scandal where one doesn’t exists than talking about their stance on issues.